Draft Bot Pro and Urava are both Indian legal-AI tools, but they do different core jobs. Draft Bot Pro is a drafting-first workspace priced by the number of words you generate — free for 500 words a day, then ₹999/month for 1.2 lakh words. Urava is a research-first service that returns a court-ready, citation-backed research memorandum as a PDF, priced per research — 3 free, then from ₹100 for 10. If your main task is producing and editing documents, Draft Bot Pro fits; if it is getting a cited answer to a legal question fast — including from a scanned Malayalam or Hindi document over WhatsApp — Urava fits.
This side-by-side comparison uses each tool's own published pricing (verified July 2026) so an advocate, law student, or firm can pick correctly the first time.
Quick Comparison: Draft Bot Pro vs Urava
| Feature | Draft Bot Pro | Urava |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Legal document drafting | Court-ready research memoranda |
| Entry paid price | ₹999/month | ₹100/month |
| Annual option | ₹9,990/year (2 months free) | Beta per-volume tiers |
| Metered by | Words you draft | Number of researches |
| Free tier | 500 words/day + 1 research question/day (ongoing) | 3 research memos (one-time) |
| Output format | Editable draft in-app (Word/PDF export) | Citation-backed memo (PDF) |
| Access | Web app | WhatsApp-native + web |
| Scanned vernacular OCR | Not advertised | Malayalam, Hindi, English (Sarvam OCR) |
| Judgment coverage | 2.4 crore+ judgments in-app | Citation-backed via Indian legal databases |
| Best for | Lawyers who draft high volumes | Juniors/solos who need fast cited research |
What Is Draft Bot Pro?
Draft Bot Pro is an AI legal-drafting workspace for Indian lawyers and law students that generates and edits documents in-app and meters usage by the number of words you draft. Built by a team that describes itself as lawyers, it uses a multi-step "agentic" approach to detect the correct format for a draft and produce it, and it bundles in-app legal research that returns an AI overview with sources, provisions, and judgments you can read without leaving the tool. Its marketing positions it as an alternative to traditional databases like SCC Online and Manupatra and as a safer replacement for ChatGPT because answers are source-backed.
Draft Bot Pro's own pricing page (draftbotpro.com/pricing) lists a Free Forever plan giving 500 words of drafting per day (renewing every 24 hours) plus one research question per day, a monthly plan at ₹999 covering 1.2 lakh words of drafting with 35-page document uploads and 1 GB of storage, and a yearly plan at ₹9,990 (billed as ten months, two free) covering 16 lakh words and 5 GB. The unit that runs down is words drafted — not documents or researches.
What Is Urava?
Urava is a WhatsApp-native legal-research service that turns a typed question or a scanned vernacular document into a court-ready, citation-backed research memorandum (PDF) in about ten minutes, billed per research. You send a question — or a photograph of a notice, order, or FIR in Malayalam, Hindi, or English — and Urava reads it with Sarvam OCR, runs the research, and returns a structured memo with the statutory provisions and case citations laid out for filing or client advice.
Urava's beta pricing (every plan has identical features — you only pay for volume) is: Free — 3 researches; Junior — ₹100 for 10; Pro — ₹400 for 50; Firm — ₹1,800 for 300; Firm Pro — ₹3,600 for 750. List prices are higher (₹250 / ₹1,000 / ₹4,500 / ₹9,000); the beta runs at roughly 60% off. The unit that runs down is a completed research memo.
Pricing Compared: Words vs Researches
The two tools bill on different meters, so a like-for-like table matters more than a headline number.
| Draft Bot Pro | Urava | |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest paid entry | ₹999/month | ₹100 (10 researches) |
| What you get for it | 1.2 lakh drafting words/month | 10 court-ready memos |
| Effective unit cost | Per word drafted | ₹10/research (Junior) → ₹4.80/research (Firm Pro) |
| Free allowance | 500 words/day, ongoing | 3 memos, one-time |
For a junior advocate who needs a handful of cited research memos a month, Urava's ₹100-for-10 entry is dramatically cheaper than a ₹999 monthly drafting subscription, and Urava's per-research cost falls to ₹4.80 per memo on the Firm Pro tier. For a lawyer whose day is spent generating and revising long documents, Draft Bot Pro's word bucket may be the better fit — you are paying for drafting throughput, not for discrete answers. Neither is universally "cheaper"; they price different work.
Which Does Better Legal Research?
Both tools claim source-backed, citation-carrying research, and both are right to make verification the headline feature — hallucinated citations are the single biggest risk in AI legal work, and Indian courts have already penalised advocates for filing fabricated case law. Whichever tool you use, run the output through a quick check: our guide to how to verify AI-generated case citations before filing walks through the five-step check against e-SCR and Indian Kanoon.
The practical difference is packaging. Draft Bot Pro surfaces research inside the drafting workspace so you can pull provisions and judgments into a document you are already writing. Urava returns research as a self-contained memorandum — the citations, the ratio, and the applicable sections structured as a filing-ready document rather than as chat you then have to assemble.
Drafting vs Research: Which Do You Actually Need?
This is the real decision, and it is not about price. Ask what leaves your desk most days:
- Mostly documents — plaints, replies, agreements, notices you draft and revise: a word-metered drafting tool like Draft Bot Pro is built for that motion.
- Mostly questions — "what is the limitation for this appeal", "is anticipatory bail maintainable here", "what does this Malayalam order actually say": a per-research memo service like Urava answers those with citations you can stand behind in court.
Many advocates do both, which is why the meters matter: a drafting subscription charges you the same whether you draft one long petition or twenty, while a per-research tool charges nothing until you actually ask a question.
Free Tier: Which Is Enough to Start?
Draft Bot Pro's Free Forever plan (500 words/day plus one research question/day) is genuinely usable for light, ongoing drafting because it renews every 24 hours. Urava's free tier is 3 full research memos — fewer in number, but each is a complete, court-ready output rather than a daily word slice. If you want to test drafting throughput, start free on Draft Bot Pro; if you want to see what a finished cited memo looks like — including from a scanned vernacular document — Urava's 3 free researches show the whole product.
Vernacular and WhatsApp: Where Urava Differs
The clearest functional gap is intake. Urava accepts a photographed vernacular document — a Malayalam eviction notice, a Hindi FIR, an English order — reads it with OCR, and researches from it, all inside WhatsApp. That matters for the 0–5-year juniors and litigants who work from their phone and whose source documents are rarely typed English. Draft Bot Pro is a web-app workspace; it is strong for sit-down drafting on a laptop, but it is not marketed as a WhatsApp, scan-and-ask tool. If your incoming work is paper in an Indian language, that difference decides it.
With over 4.5 crore cases pending across Indian courts (National Judicial Data Grid, njdg.ecourts.gov.in), the tools that win time back are the ones that meet advocates where they already work — which for most juniors is WhatsApp, not a browser tab.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Draft Bot Pro if drafting volume is your bottleneck, you work on a laptop, and a flat monthly word bucket suits your billing. Choose Urava if you need fast, cited research memos, you want to pay only for what you use, you work from WhatsApp, or your source documents arrive as scanned Malayalam/Hindi/English pages. For a wider view of the research-tool market, see how Urava compares with SCC Online's AI Pro and our Jhana vs Urava comparison.
How Urava Helps
Urava is built for the advocate who needs a defensible answer today, not a database subscription. Type a question or forward a scanned notice on WhatsApp, and get a citation-backed research memorandum as a PDF in about ten minutes — 3 researches free, then from ₹100 for 10. Start free at urava.app/register and run your next real research question through it before you decide.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Draft Bot Pro or Urava cheaper for a junior advocate?
For a junior who needs a few cited research memos a month, Urava is cheaper: ₹100 buys 10 memos (₹10 each), versus Draft Bot Pro's ₹999/month drafting subscription. But the two bill different work — Draft Bot Pro meters words drafted, Urava meters completed researches — so a lawyer drafting high volumes may get more value from Draft Bot Pro's word bucket.
Does Draft Bot Pro do legal research or only drafting?
Draft Bot Pro does both. It is drafting-first — a workspace that generates and edits documents metered by words — but it also includes in-app legal research that returns an AI overview with sources, statutory provisions, and judgments you can read without leaving the tool, drawing on a stated 2.4 crore+ judgment archive.
Can I use either tool on WhatsApp?
Urava is WhatsApp-native: you send a question or a scanned document and receive a research memo PDF in the chat. Draft Bot Pro is a web application (app.draftbotpro.com) built for laptop drafting and is not marketed as a WhatsApp tool. If phone-and-WhatsApp workflow matters to you, that is Urava's clearest advantage.
Which tool handles Malayalam or Hindi documents?
Urava accepts photographed vernacular documents and reads them with Sarvam OCR in Malayalam, Hindi, and English, then researches from them. Draft Bot Pro is not advertised as a scanned-vernacular-document intake tool. For Kerala and Hindi-belt advocates working from paper notices and orders, Urava's OCR intake is the deciding feature.
Are the case citations from these AI tools safe to file?
Both tools return source-backed citations, but no AI output should be filed unverified — Indian courts have penalised advocates for fabricated case law. Always confirm each citation against e-SCR or Indian Kanoon before filing; a two-minute check protects you from a misconduct finding regardless of which tool produced the draft or memo.